Jan Choinski vs Manvydas Balciunas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recently, Choinski has demonstrated better second serve performance, winning 46.1% of points compared to Balciunas' 42.14%. Could this give Choinski a slight edge in serving? Yes, it suggests a more reliable second serve under pressure.
• In terms of return game, Balciunas outperforms Choinski by winning 45.27% of opponent's second serve points versus Choinski's 43.14%. Additionally, Balciunas excels on first serve returns with 30.42% compared to Choinski's 26.83%.
• When it comes to saving breakpoints, Choinski has managed a 57.56% success rate, while Balciunas trails at 48.54%, indicating Choinski's composure under pressure.
• Over the past year, Balciunas has a higher match win rate at 65% compared to Choinski's 54.84%. Does this hint at a stronger overall performance? It might suggest Balciunas' better form and consistency.
• Surface preferences show Choinski excels on clay with a 62% win rate, whereas Balciunas performs best on hard courts with a 72% win rate. Given these stats, the playing surface could significantly influence the outcome.
• At the player level, Choinski competes more in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a win rate of 56.36%, and Balciunas focuses on Futures/ITF events, boasting a 65% win rate. The difference in competition levels might be a factor to consider.
• Choinski has faced slightly tougher opponents with an average rank of 267.13 compared to Balciunas' 309.32, possibly preparing Choinski for more challenging match-ups.
• In deciding sets, Choinski has been victorious 64% of the time, whereas Balciunas has only won 38%, indicating Choinski's resilience in crucial moments.
• Regarding break point conversion, Balciunas holds an advantage, converting 41.3% of opportunities as opposed to Choinski's 34.68%. This might be key during pivotal moments in the match.

Editorial Prediction (July 14, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent statistics presents an interesting match-up between Choinski and Balciunas. Choinski's strong second serve performance provides him with a slight serving advantage, whereas Balciunas shows proficiency in return games.

While Balciunas has a better overall match win rate in the past year, Choinski excels at saving break points and performing in deciding sets, demonstrating a level of composure when the pressure peaks.

Although surface type might alter dynamics, with Choinski favoring clay and Balciunas thriving on hard courts, the mental fortitude displayed by Choinski in high-stakes moments cannot be overlooked.

Ultimately, assessing these comparative factors suggests that Choinski may have a slight advantage and is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.